View Single Post
Old 07-06-2016   #3
SlyGuy
R5 Cao Thủ Thượng Thừa
 
SlyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,696
Thanks: 5,946
Thanked 3,276 Times in 1,244 Posts
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1296 Post(s)
Rep Power: 21
SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8
SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8SlyGuy Reputation Uy Tín Level 8
Default

It baffles me how often people limit themselves to ''conventional'' warfare. Look, in a war between NATO and China, Russia will most certainly be involved and there would be nukes involved. Yes, nukes. Conventional warfare ceased to exist the moment the US dropped the bomb on Japan. Russia has about 1700+ nuclear warheads and delivery capabilities. Same goes for China (except for the number of nuclear warheads). Neither side would win as the damage would be devastating......

If you honestly think the US can fend off all of China and Rus's nuclear weapons, then you are living in a fairytale. Both sides would reduce each other to smithereens along with about 40% of the global population.
SlyGuy_is_offline  
Quay về trang chủ Lên đầu Xuống dưới Lên 3000px Xuống 3000px
 
Page generated in 0.09746 seconds with 10 queries