View Single Post
Old 06-26-2017   #4
corumstation
R7 Tuyệt Đỉnh Cao Thủ
 
corumstation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,551
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5,833 Times in 1,025 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Rep Power: 25
corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7
corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7
Default

1) The quacking duck didn't win anything

2) SCOTUS only allowed implementation on individual from the listed countries that has no family and or formal relationship from coming. The implementation isn't allowed against individual with ...

---> family relations
---> already approved papers to come
---> established formal relationships, ie. employment, students in US for education, refugees, asylum status and etc ...

3) SCOTUs will hear the arguments in October?

--> By that time, the 90 days implementation may be a mute point

4) A hollow victory for the quacking duck ... only in the most desperate sense since he hasn't done much except for his daily need for affirmation and ass kissing from his cabinets and trumpanzees!

---> The quacking duck didn't even like this watered down version that SCOTUS had considered!

---> All other components of this watered down version was return to sender, don't pass Go and ...
corumstation_is_offline  
Quay về trang chủ Lên đầu Xuống dưới Lên 3000px Xuống 3000px
 
Page generated in 0.11801 seconds with 10 queries