View Single Post
Old 07-06-2017   #2
corumstation
R7 Tuyệt Đỉnh Cao Thủ
 
corumstation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,551
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5,833 Times in 1,025 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Rep Power: 25
corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7
corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7corumstation Reputation Uy Tín Level 7
Default

1) Politico-Morning Consult is right leaning

2) This watered down ban wasn't what the quacking duck wanted!

3) The quacking duck original ban was hated and not supproted by the majority of people, as even Politico-Morning Consult polls have revealed, and SCOTUS has only allowed a miniscule portion of the ban to take place!

Even if you believe these polling numbers, it only indicates people support for SCOTUS interpretation of US laws and the majority are against the quacking duck UNLAWFUL edict!
corumstation_is_offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to corumstation For This Useful Post:
LosAngelesLakers (07-07-2017)
Quay về trang chủ Lên đầu Xuống dưới Lên 3000px Xuống 3000px
 
Page generated in 0.11454 seconds with 10 queries