View Single Post
Old 02-11-2024   #12
NguoiTânĐinh
R6 Đệ Nhất Cao Thủ
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 3,945
Thanks: 30
Thanked 818 Times in 499 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Rep Power: 8
NguoiTânĐinh Reputation Uy Tín Level 3NguoiTânĐinh Reputation Uy Tín Level 3NguoiTânĐinh Reputation Uy Tín Level 3NguoiTânĐinh Reputation Uy Tín Level 3NguoiTânĐinh Reputation Uy Tín Level 3NguoiTânĐinh Reputation Uy Tín Level 3NguoiTânĐinh Reputation Uy Tín Level 3NguoiTânĐinh Reputation Uy Tín Level 3NguoiTânĐinh Reputation Uy Tín Level 3NguoiTânĐinh Reputation Uy Tín Level 3NguoiTânĐinh Reputation Uy Tín Level 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NguoiTânĐinh View Post
Tao thấy SCOTUS chẳng có cái đéo ǵ khó khăn trong "sự cố" này hết á.... Theo luật pháp Mỹ, như tao viết đâu đó, th́ ch́ có 2/3 SENATE + 2/3 HOUSE th́ mới có đủ thẩm quyền tuyệt đối để "truy tố" một TT tại vị. CASE DISMISSED. Mẹ bố tiên sư....

ĐÉO PHẢI TAO "PHÁN" ĐÂU ĐÂY NHÁ".... CHO LŨ ĐẦN LŨ NHŨN NĂO HỌC HỎI THÊM THÔI.... MẸ KIẾP...

The Supreme Court appears inclined to rule against Colorado and in favor of Donald Trump in the state’s attempt to bar him from the presidential ballot. That, in any case, is the conclusion many have drawn from the questions raised by the justices during this week’s oral arguments on the case. Some suggest that the vote will be nine to zero in Trump’s favor, since the court can see—like everyone else with common sense—the chaos that will ensue if individual states are given the right to disqualify candidates from presidential ballots. From that standpoint this does not look to be a difficult call for the court.
NguoiTânĐinh_is_offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.04727 seconds with 9 queries