The Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC) People's Court handed down death sentences to a Vietnamese drug lord and 26 of her accomplices on Friday. This case marks the largest number of individuals sentenced to death in Vietnam in the past decade, reflecting the severity of the crime.

The 35-member drug trafficking network was found to have smuggled a total of 626 kilograms of illegal drugs from Cambodia into Vietnam between March 2018 and November 2022. The court detailed the extensive nature of the operation, which involved a significant amount of drugs being transported across borders over a four-year period.

Vu Hoang Oanh, also known as Oanh Ha, was identified as the mastermind behind the operation. At 67 years old, she was convicted of illegal drug trafficking and fined VND 200 million (approximately US$7,855). Oanh Ha's leadership role in the network made her the central figure in the court's decision.

Along with Oanh Ha, 26 of her subordinates were sentenced to death. These individuals were convicted for their involvement in the trafficking, transportation, and storage of illegal drugs. The scale of their involvement in the operation led to their harsh sentences.

In addition to those sentenced to death, six other members of the network were handed life sentences, while two others received 20-year prison terms. The court also ordered all of the defendants to return the illicit profits, which amounted to tens of billions of dong, to the state budget.

Vietnam is known for its strict stance on drug crimes, and the country’s legal framework includes some of the toughest drug laws in the world. Those convicted of possessing or smuggling more than 600 grams of heroin or cocaine or 2.5 kilograms of methamphetamine can face the death penalty. This case is a clear example of the government’s zero-tolerance policy toward drug trafficking and its commitment to enforcing severe punishments for those involved in such criminal activities.

Green tea with lemon is more than just a refreshing beverage—it’s a health-boosting powerhouse packed with antioxidants and nutrients. Research highlights its numerous benefits, from aiding weight loss to protecting against chronic diseases like diabetes and cancer. Here’s an in-depth look at its remarkable advantages:

1. Promotes Weight Loss
Green tea contains caffeine and catechins, potent antioxidants that play a role in accelerating metabolism. According to Medical News Today, catechins help break down excess fat, while caffeine and catechins together increase energy expenditure.

Adding lemon to green tea enhances its fat-burning effect, making it an excellent choice for those aiming to shed extra pounds.

2. Protects Against Diabetes
Green tea may improve blood sugar control by reducing insulin resistance and enhancing insulin efficiency, helping to lower the risk of type 2 diabetes.

Lemon, with a low glycemic index (around 20), prevents rapid spikes in blood sugar levels. Rich in soluble fiber, lemon also helps regulate blood sugar and cholesterol, while its vitamin C content has been linked to lowering fasting blood sugar levels.

3. Enhances Heart Health
Both green tea and lemon are heart-friendly. They improve blood vessel function, reduce inflammation, and help maintain healthy cholesterol levels. Regular consumption of green tea with lemon has been associated with a reduced risk of heart disease.

4. Supports Brain Health
Lemon’s bioactive compounds, as shown in studies from the U.S. National Library of Medicine, provide protective effects against oxidative stress, aging, and cognitive decline. These compounds may enhance brain function and protect against neurodegenerative diseases.

The catechins in green tea also play a role in safeguarding neurological health, offering protection against disorders like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.

5. Protects Against Cancer
Green tea’s EGCG (epigallocatechin gallate), one of its most powerful antioxidants, has demonstrated significant anti-inflammatory and anticancer potential. It may prevent the development of various cancers.

Similarly, citrus fruits like lemon are linked to a lower risk of several types of cancer. Together, green tea and lemon form a formidable duo in protecting against cellular damage and inflammation that could lead to cancer.

Conclusion
The combination of green tea and lemon offers a multitude of health benefits, making it a valuable addition to a daily routine. From promoting weight loss and enhancing heart and brain health to reducing the risks of diabetes and cancer, this drink is a simple yet powerful way to support overall well-being.

Certain morning beverages, such as apple cider vinegar and lemon water, can complement your weight loss journey when combined with a healthy diet and lifestyle, according to health experts. These drinks not only aid in metabolism but also support digestion and detoxification, helping to kickstart your day on a healthier note. Dr. Rohini Patil, a nutritionist, highlights four such beverages that can be incorporated into your morning routine.

1. Herbal Detox Tea
Herbal detox tea is an excellent way to boost your metabolism in the morning, supporting weight loss and digestion. Using green tea as a base is recommended, as it contains catechins, compounds that promote fat burning during exercise.

Additional ingredients like dandelion, ginger, and licorice root further enhance the drink's benefits. These ingredients help reduce water retention, improve digestion, and curb appetite, making the tea a powerful morning elixir for detoxification and weight loss.

2. Lemon Water
Lemon water is a hydrating and revitalizing beverage that can enhance your metabolism and suppress appetite. Lemons are rich in vitamin C and pectin fiber, which support digestion and detoxification. Additionally, they help alkalize the body, maintaining a balanced pH level.

According to the Cleveland Clinic, the acidity in lemons mirrors the natural environment of the stomach, aiding in breaking down food and boosting stomach acid levels, which often decline with age. This makes lemon water a simple yet effective drink to jumpstart digestion.

3. Apple Cider Vinegar
A mixture of apple cider vinegar with water, honey, and lemon serves as another effective morning drink. It helps in alkalizing the body, breaking down fats, and reducing blood sugar levels. It is also known to combat bloating and suppress appetite while increasing metabolism.

Apple cider vinegar’s unique properties make it a great addition to your morning routine, especially for those aiming to reduce bloating and burn fat more efficiently.

4. Turmeric Water
Warm water infused with turmeric and a dash of honey or lemon can provide a multitude of benefits, from boosting digestion to reducing inflammation. Turmeric’s anti-inflammatory properties help combat body inflammation, which is often linked to weight gain.

The curcumin in turmeric has thermogenic properties, which increase body heat and promote fat burning. Additionally, turmeric aids in the production of bile, essential for fat digestion, and helps maintain a healthy gut. Drinking turmeric water in the morning can alleviate bloating, gas, and indigestion, contributing to overall weight management.

Incorporating these drinks into your morning routine can provide a natural and refreshing way to support weight loss and maintain a healthy lifestyle. Each drink offers unique benefits that not only enhance metabolism but also aid in digestion and detoxification, making them a valuable addition to your daily habits.

Walking 10,000 steps a day can uplift your mood, support weight loss, and enhance your immune system, among other health benefits.
This daily step count, roughly equivalent to 8 kilometers, originated from a marketing campaign for an early pedometer before the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, according to Eating Well. Despite its arbitrary beginnings, recent research confirms the numerous benefits of achieving this daily step count:

Enhances mood and cognitive function

Walking releases endorphins, which improve mood and alleviate stress and anxiety, benefits that are heightened when walking outdoors. A 2022 meta-analysis in the Journal of Clinical Medicine found significant mental health improvements, offering relief from depression and anxiety symptoms.

Additionally, a 2023 study in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease Reports shows that regular walking enhances cognitive functions and memory.

Improves mobility and joint health

Walking benefits joint health, particularly for those with knee osteoarthritis, as shown by data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative center. It can reduce knee pain without increasing the risk of knee replacement.

Rachel MacPherson, a certified personal trainer with Garage Gym Reviews, notes: "Walking, a natural human movement, enhances joint health and increases circulation without the impact of more intense exercises like running."

Supports for healthy weight loss

Walking, though less vigorous than running, effectively increases caloric burn, aiding weight management and loss. A 2022 study in the Nutrients journal reported that walking at various speeds led to fat loss among postmenopausal women, highlighting its role as a practical, low-impact exercise suitable for all fitness levels.

Enhances lung function

Regular walking improves lung function by increasing lung capacity, allowing for more oxygen intake with each inhalation, according to The Times of India. The Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention indicates that walking strengthens respiratory muscles, boosts ventilation, and improves overall lung performance, contributing to enhanced endurance and health.

Enhances immune capabilities

Walking can boost the immune system, helping the body fight infections and diseases. Research in the British Journal of Sports Medicine shows that adults who walk at least 10,000 steps daily are 43% less likely to catch a cold than those who walk less. This improvement is due to increased movement of immune cells, better lymphatic system function, and reduced inflammation.

Promotes speedier recovery

Walking is an effective active recovery method, aiding muscle recovery and blood flow after intense exercise, preventing stiffness and enhancing overall recovery, as reported in a 2022 study in the Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology.

Vietnam’s birthrate in 2024 has dropped to an estimated 1.91 children per woman, the lowest in the nation’s history. This marks a significant departure from the traditional belief that the Year of the Dragon, considered auspicious, would lead to a rise in births. Deputy Minister of Health Nguyen Thi Lien Huong revealed the figure during a population conference in Hanoi, noting that this is the third consecutive year the birthrate has remained below the replacement level of 2.1 children per woman.

The decline has been steady over recent years, falling from 2.11 in 2021 to 2.01 in 2022, 1.96 in 2023, and now 1.91 in 2024. Despite expectations of a birth surge during the Year of the Dragon, the record low reflects changing societal attitudes, with families moving away from traditional beliefs. It also highlights the limited effectiveness of current pro-natalist policies in reversing the downward trend.

Urban areas with higher levels of socioeconomic development continue to experience the lowest birthrates, averaging 1.7–1.8 children per woman over the past two decades. In 2024, the urban rate dropped further to 1.67, while rural areas recorded a higher rate of 2.08.

Regional disparities are also evident. Areas with fewer economic opportunities, such as the northern midlands and mountains (2.34 children per woman) and the Central Highlands (2.24), reported significantly higher birthrates. In contrast, the southeast region, which includes Ho Chi Minh City, recorded the country’s lowest rate at 1.48 children per woman.

The long-term implications of this decline are concerning. Deputy Director of the Ministry of Health's Population Department, Pham Vu Hoang, warned that if low fertility persists, Vietnam’s population could begin to shrink after 2054. Projections indicate an annual population decline of 0.04% between 2054 and 2059 and 0.18% between 2064 and 2069, equating to an average loss of 200,000 people per year. By contrast, maintaining the replacement-level birthrate of 2.1 children per woman would allow for slight annual population growth of 0.17%, adding approximately 200,000 people per year.

Experts caution that low fertility can have severe consequences, as seen in Japan, which has the world’s fastest-aging society. An aging population often leads to increased social, healthcare, and welfare costs, labor shortages, and reduced socioeconomic resources. Vietnam may face similar challenges if its birthrate continues to decline.

In response, the government has set a population strategy aiming to stabilize the birthrate at 2.1 children per woman and reach a population of 104 million by 2030. The Ministry of Health’s draft Population Law proposes several measures to address the issue. These include abolishing penalties for having a third child, encouraging women to marry before the age of 30 and have two children by age 35, and providing financial incentives to promote childbirth.

The record low birthrate in 2024 serves as a wake-up call for Vietnam. The country faces an urgent need to implement effective policies to counter the long-term impacts of declining fertility and ensure sustainable population growth.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed a landmark bill on Thursday that will require major fossil fuel companies to pay fees aimed at addressing the effects of climate change. The new law, known as the Climate Change Superfund Act, establishes a fund to finance infrastructure projects designed to repair or prevent damage caused by climate change.

Under the law, companies responsible for significant greenhouse gas emissions will be required to contribute to the fund. The money will be used for resiliency projects, such as restoring coastal wetlands and upgrading roads, bridges, and water drainage systems to withstand extreme weather events.

State Senator Liz Krueger, who sponsored the bill, called it a major step toward holding polluters accountable. "The planet’s largest climate polluters bear a unique responsibility for creating the climate crisis, and they must pay their fair share to help regular New Yorkers deal with the consequences," Krueger said.

The legislation targets the largest greenhouse gas emitters between 2000 and 2018, although penalties won't be enforced immediately. The state first needs to create rules for identifying responsible companies, notifying them of fines, and deciding which projects will receive funding.

The measure is likely to face legal challenges. The American Petroleum Institute, the oil industry’s leading lobbying group, criticized the law, describing it as "a punitive new fee on American energy" and stating that it is "evaluating its options moving forward."

New York's legislation follows Vermont's adoption of a similar law earlier this year, signaling a growing trend among states to compel fossil fuel companies to shoulder the costs of climate adaptation.

Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba expressed eagerness on Friday to move into the historic official residence despite its long-standing reputation for hauntings. The residence, a site of military rebellions and political assassinations, has been surrounded by ghostly rumors for decades.

Ishiba, who took office in October following the resignation of Fumio Kishida, has delayed moving into the residence pending inspections and repairs. While he refrained from specifying a move-in date for security reasons, he indicated his intention to relocate soon.

"I'm not particularly afraid," Ishiba remarked during an impromptu press conference when questioned about the hauntings. "It might be scary to actually see something, but it's not something we're worried about."

Constructed in 1929 and originally serving as the prime minister's office, the residence has witnessed several historical incidents, including the 1932 assassination of Prime Minister Tsuyoshi Inukai during a military uprising. Over the years, rumors of ghostly apparitions have persisted, fueled by eerie accounts such as those from Yasuko Hata, the wife of former Prime Minister Tsutomu Hata. In her 1996 memoir, she described experiencing an oppressive presence and noted claims of military officers being spotted in the garden late at night.

The structure underwent extensive remodeling in the early 2000s and has been designated as the official prime ministerial residence since 2005. Despite this, several leaders, including Shinzo Abe and Yoshihide Suga, opted not to live there, with Abe's delayed move in 2013 sparking government denials of haunting rumors.

Kishida, Ishiba's predecessor, moved into the residence in December 2021. When asked about ghostly encounters, Kishida reassured reporters that he had experienced no such phenomena and had slept peacefully during his stay.

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump filed a brief on Friday urging the Supreme Court to delay enforcement of a law that would ban TikTok unless it is sold by its Chinese owner, ByteDance. The law is set to take effect the day before Trump’s Jan. 20, 2025, inauguration.

Trump’s legal team argued that the court should pause the statutory deadline to allow time for further deliberation. The brief stated, “In light of the novelty and difficulty of this case, the court should consider staying the statutory deadline to grant more breathing space to address these issues.” This pause, the team wrote, would give the incoming Trump administration an opportunity to pursue a political resolution to the issue.

During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump strongly opposed TikTok, citing national security concerns. He attempted to ban the app, arguing that its Chinese ownership posed risks of data misuse or propaganda manipulation by the Chinese government. These claims were denied by both ByteDance and Beijing.

U.S. officials expressed unease over TikTok's immense popularity with younger users and its alleged potential for spreading propaganda. Trump had previously advocated for a U.S. company to purchase TikTok, with a portion of the sale benefiting the U.S. government. His successor, President Joe Biden, signed a law to ban the app over similar concerns.

Trump’s Reversal on TikTok
In a surprising turn of events, Trump has since softened his stance on TikTok. At a recent press conference, he expressed a newfound openness to the app, saying his administration would reconsider the potential ban. Earlier this month, Trump met with TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida.

Speaking to Bloomberg, Trump explained his change of heart, stating, "Now (that) I'm thinking about it, I'm for TikTok, because you need competition." He pointed out that without TikTok, platforms like Facebook and Instagram, both owned by Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta, would dominate the social media landscape.

Trump’s critique of Facebook comes against the backdrop of the platform banning him after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack. Although these bans were later lifted, they left a lasting mark on Trump’s relationship with major social media platforms.

The Legal Battle
In the brief filed Friday, Trump’s lawyer, John Sauer, clarified that the president-elect was not taking a position on the legal merits of the case. “President Trump takes no position on the underlying merits of this dispute,” Sauer wrote. Instead, the brief urged the court to delay the divestment deadline, set for Jan. 19, 2025, to allow the incoming administration time to seek a political resolution.

The case has also drawn the attention of free speech advocates. A coalition of rights groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, submitted a separate brief to the Supreme Court, opposing the enforcement of the ban. They argued that such a move would infringe on Americans’ free speech rights and disrupt their ability to access diverse online content.

“Such a ban is unprecedented in our country and, if it goes into effect, will cause a far-reaching disruption in Americans’ ability to engage with the content and audiences of their choice online,” the rights groups’ filing stated.

Supreme Court Proceedings
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear TikTok’s appeal against Biden’s law, formally known as the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act. TikTok claims that the act violates its First Amendment free speech rights. With oral arguments scheduled for Jan. 10, the case will move forward on an expedited timeline.

AFP, along with other fact-checking organizations, has been contracted by TikTok in several countries to verify videos containing potential misinformation. This partnership underscores TikTok’s efforts to counter criticism and maintain credibility as the legal battle intensifies.

Dec 23, 2024
It's my first time in Vietnam and our first stop is Hanoi. We're spending the day exploring Hanoi and visiting some of the must-see places including Train Street, Hoan Kiem Lake and the Old Quarter! We're also going to try some Vietnamese food including a Bánh mì and we also try some Vietnamese coffee. I'm so excited to share with you my honest first impressions of Vietnam.

Tens of millions of social media accounts such as Facebook, Youtube, Tiktok ... will be deleted, locked in the new decree issued by the Hanoi government. Overseas pages will be blocked. This means that pages like BBC, RFA ... on Facebook, Youtube will not be displayed to users in Vietnam. Livestream pages selling products, Youtubers reporting news, making money from advertising on similar platforms, Tiktokers will have their accounts locked, or must verify their identity, pay taxes. Pages that the government "does not like" will be permanently deleted. According to an IT expert, this new management move by the government will force Facebook, Youtube, Tiktok to lock, delete, and block tens of millions of accounts in exchange for continuing to operate in Vietnam to make money.

CSVN: Officially from December 25, cases will have their FACEBOOK and YOUTUBE social network accounts permanently locked

According to Decree No. 147/2024/ND-CP of the Government, from December 25, 2024, users will have their social network accounts permanently locked if they post the following content.

According to Point e, Clause 3, Article 23; Point b, Clause 3, Article 27 of Decree 147/2024/ND-CP, the regulations on account authentication of social network service users are as follows:

- Verify the account of social network service users using a mobile phone number in Vietnam. Only in the case where the user confirms that he/she does not have a mobile phone number in Vietnam, the organization or enterprise providing social network services shall authenticate the account using a personal identification number in accordance with the provisions of law on electronic identification and authentication.

- In case the service user uses the livestream feature for commercial purposes, the organization or enterprise providing the social network service must authenticate the account using a personal identification number in accordance with the provisions of law on identification and electronic authentication.

- Ensure that only authenticated accounts are allowed to post information (write articles, comment, livestream) and share information on social networks.

In addition, Clause 7, Article 35 of the Decree stipulates cases where social network accounts and community pages will be temporarily or permanently locked. Specifically as follows:

- Temporarily lock accounts, community pages, community groups, and content channels that regularly post content that violates the law. Specifically, within 30 days, there are at least 5 times of providing content that violates the law or within 90 days, there are at least 10 times of providing content that violates the law and the Ministry of Information and Communications and the Ministry of Public Security request to block and remove it.

The maximum locking time is 24 hours upon request by phone, in writing or via electronic means from the Ministry of Information and Communications (Department of Radio, Television and Electronic Information), the Ministry of Public Security (Department of Cyber ​​Security and High-Tech Crime Prevention and Control), the local Department of Information and Communications and competent agencies according to specialized laws or when detecting violations themselves. The temporary locking time is from 7 days to 30 days, depending on the level and number of violations.

- Permanently lock social network accounts, community pages, community groups, content channels posting content that violates national security or accounts, community pages, community groups, content channels that have been temporarily locked 3 times or more upon request by phone, in writing or via electronic means from the Ministry of Information and Communications, the Ministry of Public Security, the local Department of Information and Communications and competent agencies according to specialized laws.

Thus, from December 25, 2024, when Decree 147/2024/ND-CP officially takes effect, personal social network accounts, community groups/associations or content channels on social networks may be permanently locked if they post content that violates national security or have been temporarily locked 3 times or more.

In case agencies, organizations and enterprises providing social network services do not handle content and services that violate the law, do not temporarily lock or permanently lock the activities of accounts that violate the law upon request, the Ministry of Information and Communications will suspend the provision of social network services or revoke the License/Certificate of notification of provision of social network services granted to agencies, organizations and enterprises according to the provisions of Article 33 of this Decree.

Account owners, content channel owners, community page owners, and community group administrators on social networks must not name their accounts, pages, channels, or groups similar to or identical to the names of press agencies; Do not use social networks to produce content in the form of reports, investigations, or press interviews.

Donald Trump's interview with Time, accompanying the magazine naming him its 2024 Person of the Year, was replete with a wide selection of falsehoods and misleading claims from the president-elect.
By Tom Norton

Attachment 2468476

The interview included significant admissions, including toning down claims that he could make groceries cheaper, playing down rhetoric against the transgender community, and hailing parts of the Project 2025 policy agenda as "very conservative and very good."

The incoming president also used the interview to double down on mistruths about immigration, his record, and his mandate from the 2024 election. Newsweek has assessed some of the key claims and reached out to his media representatives via email for comment.

"The country was angry because of immigration, because of the people, you know, millions and millions of people. I was saying it could be 21 million people. They were saying a much lesser number, but it wasn't a much lesser number. But even if it was, it was irrelevant."

Trump told Time that the Democrats had not effectively understood public feeling about immigration, claiming that 21 million undocumented migrants had entered the country.

This has been repeatedly debunked by Newsweek.

The president-elect said this recently during his Fox Nation "Patriot of the Year" speech. As of September 2024, U.S. Customs and Border Protection recorded 8.2 million encounters on the Southwest border since January 2021. Including national border encounters and "gotaways," referring to estimates of undocumented migrants that evaded authorities, does not bring that figure close to 21 million people.

These "encounters" included people who crossed the border more than once and those who were detained or turned away by border enforcement. The highest estimates of the number of people living in the United States with undocumented status, which would include people who entered the country during Trump's last administration, are around 16 million.

"...I fixed the border, and it was really fixed."

This is subjective, but if Trump is judging it by the number of monthly border patrol encounters it was not "fixed" by the end of his presidency.

According to official figures, in January 2021, Trump's final month of his first presidential term, there were around 75,000 encounters on the Southwest border, a 77 percent increase from the 42,463 encounters the month he entered office.

While encounters fell during that first year in office, it moved significantly during his presidency, hitting a peak of 132,856 in May 2019, a more than 700 percent increase from its lowest point in April 2017.

"[Trump] was the one that ended the Russian pipeline, Nord Stream 2."

As reported by FactCheck.org, Trump did not end the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project.

He did approve sanctions against companies building the pipeline, leading to the suspension of its construction. However, the pipeline was reportedly 90 percent completed by this point. It resumed construction while Trump was in office.

"Look, if you look at the 13,000 plus, 13,099 which was issued by border patrol, they said those people were murderers, and they allowed them into our country. "

Here, Trump cites false claims that 13,099 "murderers" had been allowed into the U.S. The context of the conversation made it sound as if that had happened during the Biden administration.

Although 13,099 noncitizens on the ICE docket have been convicted of homicide, the data spans 40 years and does not cover only the Biden administration. The figures include individuals who are in jails and prisons serving a criminal sentence.

"[Separating families] wasn't my policy. It was Obama's policy."

This came up as Trump answered questions about his mass deportation plans.

As Newsweek has previously reported, while under Obama, large numbers of children were indeed housed without their parents, it was in large part driven by an influx of children arriving unaccompanied to the U.S. The Obama administration tried to keep families who entered the country together in special family centers.

Under the Trump administration's "zero tolerance" policy, officials referred everyone illegally crossing the border—adult or child—for criminal prosecution. Because children cannot be housed in jail with their parents, they were moved to separate shelters and placed with legal guardians where possible.

"By the way, when you talk about separation, we have 325,000 children here during Democrats—and this was done by Democrats—who are right now slaves, sex slaves or dead, and they were allowed."

Trump has repeatedly made this false claim that misuses audit figures combining the number of unaccompanied migrant children who had not appeared for court proceedings after issuing orders with those who had not been issued orders at all between 2019-2023.

The audit did not state that the 291,000 without court orders were missing, nor did it say that all 32,000 children who didn't appear in court could not be located. The audit included data from the Trump and Biden administrations.

His claims that these children are "slaves, sex slaves, or dead" is unsubstantiated.

"And I say, why is it that in Portland and in many other places, Minneapolis, why is it that nothing happened with them?"

Trump rebuffed questions about pardoning January 6 rioters by bringing up a misleading claim regarding the arrest and charges of those who took part in nationwide riots in 2020.

As assessed by Newsweek's Fact Check team in 2023, while many charges against protesters arrested at demonstrations following George Floyd's death were dropped, this was often due to prosecutors deciding there was a lack of evidence or that the offenses, such as curfew-breaking, were too minor to pursue; some arrests were made primarily to disperse crowds; and a low likelihood of some charges succeeding in court.

Investigations into the riot at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, were aided by far more documentary evidence. The January 6 riot took place in one central location during the day, and its events were closely recorded by legacy media, social media, police, security and other footage.

"We had 107,000 when we had the memorial a few weeks later."

One of Trump's frequent false crowd size claims is about his second rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, after he was targeted in an assassination attempt at the first event.

The 107,000 figure appears to be a mix-up with another false figure he used describing the numbers who attended a rally in Wildwood, New Jersey, in May 2024.

As Newsweek found, the unobstructed capacity at the rally site in Butler, with a crowd size of 2.5 people per square meter, was 57,000. Photos from the event show the whole site was not packed out throughout, with much of the site occupied by infrastructure, seating, facilities, and other necessary obstructions.

Mr. President,
I have heard that you won't accept your salary. You will work FREE. All you care is working for a GREAT AMERICA, but please Mr. President do accept that salary. At least use that money to give to some honest homeless people all around our nation. There are so many poor people that need help, so please take your salary that you so deserve. Thank you for listening to me.

The man suspected of killing UnitedHealth executive Brian Thompson was arrested and arraigned on Monday, marking the end of a five-day manhunt. Luigi Mangione, 26, was apprehended in Altoona, Pennsylvania, after being recognized at a McDonald’s by a customer and an employee who thought he resembled the gunman, officials announced at a press conference.

Mangione was approached by two police officers inside the restaurant, who asked if he had recently been in New York. He reportedly became visibly nervous and remained silent. A search of his backpack at the police station revealed a loaded, untraceable "ghost gun" equipped with a silencer, along with a mask and clothing matching those used in the Manhattan shooting.

Authorities also discovered multiple fraudulent IDs, a significant amount of cash, and electronic devices in Mangione’s possession. A handwritten document was found among his belongings, shedding light on his motivations and mindset. New York City Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch indicated that while the document did not name specific targets, it reflected Mangione's animosity toward corporate America.

Mangione, a Maryland native, graduated as valedictorian from a private school in Baltimore in 2016 and later earned dual engineering degrees from the University of Pennsylvania in 2020. His last known residence was in Honolulu, Hawaii, according to officials.

The brazen murder of Thompson occurred early Wednesday morning outside a Manhattan hotel. The masked gunman appeared to lie in wait before shooting Thompson in the back and fleeing the scene on a bike. Surveillance footage showed him later entering a bus station, leading investigators to believe he used a bus to leave New York City.

During Mangione's arraignment at the Blair County courthouse in Pennsylvania, he faced gun and forgery charges. Prosecutors argued that his possession of fake IDs and cash made him a flight risk, leading the judge to deny bail. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro confirmed that Mangione would face charges in New York soon.

Investigators are working to determine whether Mangione had accomplices or additional targets. Shell casings found at the scene bore the words "deny," "defend," and "depose," possibly referencing a critical book about the insurance industry. This detail has fueled speculation about Mangione’s motives, particularly his reported resentment toward corporate America.

Brian Thompson, a 50-year-old father of two and the CEO of UnitedHealth Group's insurance unit since 2021, had been in New York for the company’s annual investor conference. His death has sparked outrage and frustration among Americans discontented with rising healthcare costs and insurance practices. However, Governor Shapiro condemned any glorification of the suspect, emphasizing that policy disagreements must never justify violence.

UnitedHealth expressed its hope that Mangione’s apprehension would provide some solace to Thompson’s loved ones and colleagues, mourning the loss of a dedicated leader and family man.

Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris has reopened after five years of intensive restoration, following the devastating fire in April 2019. The reopening is a significant milestone for France and the global Catholic community, as the beloved landmark returns to its place as a center of worship and cultural heritage.

The first mass was held on Sunday, led by Paris Archbishop Laurent Ulrich. It was attended by 150 bishops, over 100 priests, and French President Emmanuel Macron. During the service, Archbishop Ulrich consecrated a new altar, which replaced the one destroyed in the fire. Addressing the congregation, he expressed "intense emotion" and extended prayers for France, which he acknowledged is facing an uncertain future.

A second mass took place in the evening, allowing approximately 2,500 ticketed visitors to witness the magnificently restored interior. Outside the cathedral, crowds braved cold and rainy weather to watch the ceremony on large screens, demonstrating the deep reverence and attachment people have for the historic site.

The reopening celebrations began on Saturday with a special ceremony attended by world leaders, including U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. French President Macron took the opportunity to express the nation's gratitude for the monumental restoration effort. Highlighting the resilience and determination that led to this moment, Macron stated, "We have rediscovered what great nations can do — achieve the impossible."

One of the most moving moments during the reopening came when firefighters, whose heroic efforts saved the structure during the 2019 blaze, walked through the congregation. They received a standing ovation as the word "Merci" ("Thank you") was projected onto the cathedral’s iconic facade and belltowers.

The cathedral will open fully to visitors on December 16, with access managed through an online reservation system. For many, this reopening is a long-awaited opportunity to reconnect with a symbol of Parisian and global heritage.

Visitors shared their reflections on the historic day. Jacques, a 21-year-old engineering student, emphasized the symbolic role of the church in modern France. He remarked, "Beyond the reconstruction work, it’s beautiful because it shows that the church still has a role, discreet and small, but it still has a role to play in France."

Monique Kashale, a 75-year-old visitor from the Democratic Republic of Congo, echoed the sentiment of devotion. Despite the cold, she expressed her joy at witnessing the reopening, saying, "For Jesus Christ I can put up with it, for the Virgin Mary it is bearable."

The restoration of Notre Dame Cathedral is a testament to the extraordinary skill and dedication of the teams involved. As a cultural and spiritual beacon, the cathedral’s revival underscores the enduring power of unity and resilience, ensuring its legacy for future generations.

Hongchi Xiao, a 61-year-old alternative healer, has been sentenced to 10 years in prison by the Winchester Crown Court in the U.K. for gross negligence manslaughter following the death of Danielle Carr-Gomm, a 71-year-old diabetic woman. The case highlights the dangerous consequences of unverified alternative therapies and the responsibility of practitioners to ensure the safety of their clients.

Case Overview
Victim: Danielle Carr-Gomm, 71, had Type 1 diabetes since 1998 and sought alternative treatments to manage her condition without insulin.
Therapy: Xiao's "paida lajin" method involved slapping participants as a purported means of curing illnesses.
Incident: Danielle attended Xiao's retreat in Wiltshire, England, in October 2016. She stopped her insulin treatment during the course, leading to severe illness and her death on the fourth day.
Negligence: Prosecutors argued Xiao was grossly negligent, knowing the risks of insulin withdrawal yet encouraging Danielle's actions. He also failed to secure medical help as her condition deteriorated.
Xiao’s Criminal History
Xiao had previously been extradited to Australia, where he faced trial for the manslaughter of a 6-year-old boy in 2015. The boy died after his parents ceased insulin treatment following Xiao’s advice during a similar retreat in Sydney.
Legal and Ethical Implications
The sentence underscores the severe repercussions for practitioners of unregulated alternative therapies:

Accountability: Practitioners must be held responsible for ensuring their methods do not harm clients, particularly when their advice leads to the cessation of life-saving treatments.
Consumer Protection: The case raises awareness about the importance of verifying the efficacy and safety of alternative medical practices.
Legal Precedents: Xiao’s conviction serves as a warning to others in the field about the potential legal consequences of gross negligence.
Public Health Concerns
The tragedy underscores the importance of evidence-based medical care and the dangers of abandoning proven treatments for unverified alternatives. It also highlights the need for regulatory oversight in the alternative healing industry to prevent similar incidents.

Xiao’s sentence is a step toward justice for Danielle Carr-Gomm and a sobering reminder of the responsibility practitioners hold over their clients' well-being.

Syrian rebels declared President Bashar al-Assad's ouster after seizing control of Damascus on Sunday, ending his family's rule after more than 13 years of civil war in a seismic moment for the Middle East.
The Islamist rebels also dealt a major blow to the influence of Russia and Iran in the region, key allies who propped up Assad during critical moments in the civil war.

Syria's army command notified officers on Sunday that Assad's regime had ended, a Syrian officer who was informed of the move told Reuters.

But the Syrian army later said it was continuing operations against "terrorist groups" in the key cities of Hama and Homs and in Deraa countryside.

"We celebrate with the Syrian people the news of freeing our prisoners and releasing their chains and announcing the end of the era of injustice in Sednaya prison," the rebels said, referring to a large jail on the outskirts of Damascus where the Syrian government detained thousands.

The Syrian rebel coalition said on Sunday it is continuing work to complete the transfer of power in Syria to a transitional governing body with full executive powers.

"The great Syrian revolution has moved from the stage of struggle to overthrow the Assad regime to the struggle to build a Syria together that befits the sacrifices of its people," it added in a statement.

Thousands in cars and on foot congregated at a main square in Damascus waving and chanting "Freedom" from a half century of Assad family rule, witnesses said.

The dramatic collapse also marks a dramatic moment for the Middle East, undermining Russia and Iran, which have lost a key ally at the heart of the region and creating more uncertainty as the Gaza war rages.

Orderly transition?

The pace of events has stunned Arab capitals and raised fears of a new wave of regional instability.

It marks a turning point for Syria, shattered by years of war which has turned cities to rubble, killed hundreds of thousands of people, and forced millions abroad as refugees.

Stabilising western areas of Syria captured in the rebels' advance will be key. Western governments, which have shunned the Assad-led state for years, must decide how to deal with a new administration in which a globally designated terrorist group - Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) - looks set to have influence.

HTS, which spearheaded the rebel advances across western Syria, was formerly an al Qaeda affiliate known as the Nusra Front until its leader Abu Mohammed al-Golani, severed ties with the global jihadist movement in 2016.

"The real question is how orderly will this transition be, and it seems quite clear that Golani is very eager for it to be an orderly one," said Joshua Landis, a Syria expert and Director of the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma.

Golani will not want a repeat of the chaos that swept Iraq after U.S.-led forces toppled Saddam Hussein in 2003. "They are going to have to rebuild ... they will need Europe and the U.S. to lift sanctions," Landis said.

HTS is Syria's strongest rebel group and some Syrians remain fearful it will impose draconian Islamist rule or instigate reprisals.

Countries like the United Arab Emirates and Egypt, both close U.S. allies, see Islamist militant groups as an existential threat, so HTS may face resistance from regional powers.

In a conference in Manama, Anwar Gargash, the diplomatic advisor to the United Arab Emirates president, said a main concern for that country is "extremism and terrorism."

Assad whereabouts unknown

A Syrian Air plane took off from Damascus airport around the time the capital was reported to have been taken by rebels, according to data from the Flightradar website.

The aircraft initially flew towards Syria's coastal region, a stronghold of Assad's Alawite sect, but then made an abrupt U-turn and flew in the opposite direction for a few minutes before disappearing off the map.

Reuters could not immediately ascertain who was on board.

Two Syrian sources said there was a very high probability that Assad may have been killed in a plane crash as it was a mystery why the plane took a surprise U turn and disappeared off the map according to data from the Flightradar website.

As Syrians expressed joy, Prime Minister Mohammad Ghazi al-Jalali said the country should have free elections so Syrians can choose who they want.

But that would require a smooth transition in a country with complex competing interests, from Islamists to groups with links to the United States, Russia and Turkey.

Jalali also said he had been in contact with rebel commander Abu Mohammed al-Golani to discuss managing the transitional period, marking a notable development in efforts to shape Syria's political future.

Syria's civil war, which erupted in 2011 as an uprising against Assad's rule, dragged in big outside powers, created space for jihadist militants to plot attacks around the world and sent millions of refugees into neighbouring states.

The frontlines of Syria's complex civil war were dormant for years. Then Islamists once affiliated with Al Qaeda suddenly burst into action, posing the biggest challenge to Assad, who survived with the help of Russia, Iran and Lebanon's Hezbollah.

But Assad's allies were focussed on and weakened by other crises, leaving Assad at the mercy of his opponents with an army that was not prepared to defend him.

Israel, which has severely weakened the Iran-backed groups Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, will likely celebrate the fall of Assad, another of Iran's key regional allies. But the prospects of an Islamist group ruling Syria will likely raise concerns.

Thousands of Homs residents poured onto the streets after the army withdrew from the central city, dancing and chanting "Assad is gone, Homs is free" and "Long live Syria and down with Bashar al-Assad".

Rebels fired into the air in celebration, and youths tore down posters of the Syrian president, whose territorial control has collapsed in a dizzying week-long retreat by the military.

The fall of Homs gave the insurgents control over Syria's strategic heartland and a key highway crossroads, severing Damascus from the coastal region that is the stronghold of Assad's Alawite sect and where his Russian allies have a naval base and air base.

Rebels freed thousands of detainees from the city prison. Security forces left in haste after burning their documents.

Authorities are intensifying efforts to locate the suspect in the targeted killing of Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealth’s insurance unit, in what New York City Mayor Eric Adams described as a rapidly closing "net" around the assailant. The case has captivated public attention due to its high-profile nature and the methodical planning evident in the attack.

Incident Overview
Victim: Brian Thompson, 50, CEO of UnitedHealth’s insurance unit since 2021, a married father of two.
Attack Details: Thompson was shot in the back at 6:45 a.m. ET on Wednesday, in Midtown Manhattan near Sixth Avenue. Security footage showed a masked gunman lying in wait and deliberately targeting him, ignoring other pedestrians.
Suspect Description: The gunman wore a hooded jacket, balaclava, and gray backpack, fleeing on an electric bike into Central Park.
Evidence and Developments
Recovered Evidence: A backpack resembling the suspect's was found near a Central Park playground. It contained a jacket and Monopoly money but no weapon. Police divers are searching a nearby pond for the firearm.
Surveillance Footage: Extensive camera footage traces the suspect’s movements across New York City. The gunman was last seen entering the Port Authority Bus Terminal, leading investigators to believe he may have left the city.
Physical Evidence: Authorities have gathered fingerprints, DNA, and other forensic materials linked to the case.
Law Enforcement Efforts
Rewards: A combined $60,000 reward ($10,000 from NYPD and $50,000 from the FBI) is offered for information leading to the suspect's capture.
Nationwide Search: The suspect is believed to have fled New York, prompting interstate cooperation to track his whereabouts.
Planned Attack: Police assert the attack was premeditated, based on the gunman’s actions and behavior prior to the shooting.
Statements from Officials
Mayor Eric Adams and NYPD leaders have emphasized their commitment to solving the case. "We’re going to reveal who he is and bring him to justice," Adams said, adding that releasing further details might tip off the suspect.

NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch highlighted the wealth of evidence gathered, which bolsters confidence in identifying and apprehending the shooter.

Broader Impact
The murder, occurring just before UnitedHealth’s annual investor conference, has raised questions about corporate security and the potential motives behind such a high-profile attack. As the largest U.S. health insurer, UnitedHealth’s position in the healthcare industry further elevates public and professional interest in the case.

Investigators are working against the clock, utilizing a mix of technological tools and public cooperation to bring the assailant to justice while continuing to unravel the motive behind the shocking killing.

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has called for an immediate ceasefire and negotiations to end the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, signaling a potential shift in U.S. diplomatic efforts. The call has elicited cautious responses from both Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and the Kremlin, each outlining conditions for peace.

Trump's Call for Peace
Trump, speaking on his platform Truth Social after a meeting with Zelenskiy in Paris, expressed urgency in ending what he described as "the madness." He claimed that Ukraine had lost some 400,000 soldiers—a figure encompassing both killed and wounded, according to Trump—and emphasized the need for swift action. He also suggested that Russian President Vladimir Putin and China could play critical roles in facilitating peace.

Trump's remarks came during a visit to Paris for the reopening of Notre-Dame Cathedral, where he met with Zelenskiy for an hour in the presence of French President Emmanuel Macron. While the exact details of the discussion remain unclear, both French and Ukrainian sides described the talks as "productive."

Zelenskiy's Response
Zelenskiy responded on social media, emphasizing that peace must be backed by guarantees to prevent future aggression. He rejected the notion of a simple ceasefire, warning that such an agreement without security assurances could lead to renewed conflict. "It cannot simply end with a piece of paper and a few signatures," he said, reiterating Ukraine's commitment to maintaining sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Zelenskiy also corrected Trump's casualty figure, stating that Ukraine had lost 43,000 soldiers killed and 370,000 wounded.

The Kremlin's Stance
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov indicated that Russia remains open to negotiations but insisted they be based on agreements reached in Istanbul in 2022 and current battlefield realities. Peskov reiterated longstanding demands, including Ukraine’s exclusion from NATO and Russian control over four partially occupied Ukrainian regions.

Peskov accused Ukraine of refusing talks and highlighted Zelenskiy's decree banning contact with Russian leadership, which he said must be revoked for negotiations to proceed.

Obstacles to Peace
The key sticking points for both sides include:

Ukraine's Sovereignty: Zelenskiy demands guarantees that ensure peace and end territorial occupation.
Russia's Conditions: Putin requires Ukrainian neutrality (no NATO membership) and recognition of Russian control over certain regions.
Trust Issues: Both sides view the other with deep suspicion, citing past violations of ceasefire agreements and unimplemented accords.
Broader Implications
Trump's push for peace adds a new dimension to the conflict as the U.S. prepares for a leadership transition. His willingness to engage with both Zelenskiy and Putin could shift dynamics, though skepticism remains about his ability to mediate effectively. Additionally, China's potential involvement, as hinted by Trump, could further complicate the geopolitical landscape.

The calls for negotiations come amid ongoing hostilities, with no immediate indication of a halt in fighting. Achieving a durable peace will likely require significant concessions from both sides, as well as robust international support for any agreement.

South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol has been barred from leaving the country amid a deepening political crisis sparked by his failed attempt to impose martial law. A justice ministry official confirmed the travel ban as criminal investigations into Yoon's actions escalate, with growing calls for his resignation.

Failed Martial Law Attempt
Yoon authorized sweeping emergency powers on December 3, citing threats from "anti-state forces" and political opponents. However, the order was rescinded just six hours later after parliamentary rejection. This attempt triggered widespread protests, dissent within the military, and criticism from the opposition. Former defense minister Kim Yong-hyun was arrested for his alleged role in the martial law declaration.

Military officials, including the acting defense minister, have publicly stated they would not comply with any future martial law orders. Colonel Kim Hyun-tae, head of South Korea's elite 707th Special Missions Group, revealed that his unit was ordered to intervene in parliament during the martial law debate, claiming they were "used" by the former defense minister.

Political and Legal Turmoil
Despite surviving an impeachment vote on Saturday, Yoon faces mounting pressure, including from within his ruling People Power Party (PPP), to step down. The party has delegated presidential authority to Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, creating a constitutional crisis as opposition leaders argue this move is unconstitutional. Opposition parties plan to table another impeachment bill in the coming days.

Yoon apologized for the crisis and left his political future in the hands of his party but has refused to resign. His political party is reportedly working on an "orderly" resignation plan, while some members call for immediate legal action against him.

Economic and Diplomatic Fallout
The political instability threatens South Korea’s economy, a key player in the global tech supply chain. Opposition leader Lee Jae-myung warned of "irreversible harm" to the nation's economy. In response, the finance ministry announced measures to stabilize financial markets, including liquidity injections by the end of December.

The crisis has also raised concerns among South Korea's allies. U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin canceled a planned visit to South Korea, while Secretary of State Antony Blinken emphasized the importance of democratic processes during a call with his South Korean counterpart. South Korean foreign minister Cho Tae-yul called for efforts to rebuild international trust in the nation's leadership.

Broader Implications
The political crisis exposes divisions within the ruling party and the military, further complicating governance. Legal experts question the legitimacy of delegating presidential powers to the unelected prime minister and whether such an arrangement can last. With mid-term elections approaching and international scrutiny growing, South Korea faces a turbulent period of political uncertainty and constitutional challenges.

TikTok edged closer to being banned in the United States after it lost an appeal on Friday against a law requiring the video-sharing app to divest from its Chinese parent company by Jan. 19.

A potential U.S. ban on TikTok could escalate tensions between the United States and China as President-elect Donald Trump prepares to assume office on January 20. TikTok has announced plans to appeal the case to the Supreme Court, hoping to overturn the decision upholding the ban.

The company expressed confidence in the Supreme Court's historical commitment to protecting free speech. "The Supreme Court has an established historical record of protecting Americans' right to free speech, and we expect they will do just that on this important constitutional issue," TikTok said.

TikTok's strategy also involves Trump, who has emerged as an unexpected ally. Trump has argued that a ban would primarily benefit Meta’s platforms, owned by Mark Zuckerberg. This aligns with broader conservative criticism of Meta for allegedly suppressing right-wing content, including banning Trump from Facebook following the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

The U.S. government has justified the ban on national security grounds, alleging that TikTok enables Beijing to collect user data and spread propaganda. These claims are strongly denied by China and ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company.

National Security Debate
A law signed by President Joe Biden in April mandates that TikTok be removed from U.S. app stores and web hosting platforms unless ByteDance divests from the platform by January 19. A three-judge panel unanimously upheld this requirement, emphasizing that divestment is critical to safeguarding national security. The judges concluded that the law does not infringe on free speech, as it does not aim to suppress specific ideas or messages.

Attorney General Merrick Garland praised the ruling, reaffirming the Justice Department’s commitment to protecting Americans' sensitive data from foreign adversaries. The panel also dismissed the notion that less drastic measures than divestment would adequately address security concerns.

Trump’s Evolving Stance
Trump's support for TikTok marks a significant shift from his previous administration when he attempted to ban the app over similar concerns. That effort stalled in court after a federal judge questioned its impact on free speech. This time, Trump’s position might be influenced by support from Jeff Yass, a major Republican donor with investments in ByteDance.

However, experts warn that Trump's potential support for TikTok might not be consistent. "Donald Trump could be a lifeline for TikTok once he takes office, but halting the enforcement of the ban is easier said than done," said Jasmine Enberg, a lead analyst at Emarketer.

Despite the challenges, TikTok's growth in the U.S. remains strong. The platform reported $100 million in Black Friday sales from its shopping feature, and its U.S. ad revenue is projected to reach $15.5 billion next year, accounting for 4.5% of the country's digital ad spending.

Legal and Market Implications
The legal battle has sparked a wider debate on the intersection of national security and free speech. Gautam Hans, a Cornell Law School professor, criticized the court’s deference to the government's security argument, suggesting it undervalues the First Amendment implications. Conversely, Carl Tobias of the University of Richmond believes the Supreme Court is likely to take the case, given its critical implications for national security and constitutional rights.

A ban on TikTok would significantly alter the U.S. social media landscape, benefiting competitors like Meta, YouTube, and Snap, while harming content creators and businesses reliant on TikTok’s platform. The uncertainty surrounding TikTok’s future could have lasting effects on the digital ecosystem in the U.S.