.
BREAKING: Over 100,000 Federal Workers RESIGNED Today!
by Noah
Sep. 30, 2025
Can you feel the fat being gutted away?
How about 100,000 less federal workers sucking off the Government cheese?
It’s a beautiful thing and it happened this morning:
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Nearly 100,000 federal workers resigned this morning.
The largest resignation in history.
— Remarks (@remarks) September 30, 2025
🚨#BREAKING: Nearly 100,000 federal workers have resigned this morning making it the largest resignation in history.
— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) September 30, 2025
MASSIVE: Over 100,000 federal employees are reportedly set to resign tomorrow in the largest mass resignation in U.S. history under President Trump’s plan to cut the federal workforce. pic.twitter.com/jXDmUAddOk
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) September 29, 2025
But now let’s get into the details because while this report IS true, it might not be exactly what you think.
This all ties into the deferred resignations, not necessarily related in any way to the Government shutdown.
FedWeek explained:
While the impending September 30 end of the current fiscal year brings a threat of a potential partial government shutdown, for many federal employees it will bring a more definite change: the end of their “deferred resignation” periods.
That is the most common deadline under both the original government-wide offer—which kept employees in paid status on administrative leave up to a set separation date—and individual agency-specific offers that followed. In some cases, agencies allowed for a later date in order for employees to qualify for retirement benefits.
OPM’s most recent count is that nearly 300,000 positions will be eliminated by the end of this year—about an eighth of the total as of the start of the year.
That number includes some 275,000 due to: normal attrition as a general hiring freeze has remained in effect (with various exceptions); deferred resignation; and acceptance of other types of incentives, such as standard buyouts and/or early retirement offers.
Although OPM did not break out the figures, the large majority of those likely are leaving under deferred resignation; OPM over the summer put the acceptance figure for those offers at above 150,000. Some already have left that status, for example to take other jobs; ethics restrictions including those against outside employment still apply during deferred resignation.
I love it when a plan comes together!
President Trump is about to get EXACTLY what he wanted, and Chuck Schumer and the Democrats are going to hand it to him on a silver platter!
It seems fairly certain at this point that the Government will indeed shut down tomorrow evening.
Here is VP Vance confirming that's where we're headed:
🚨 VP VANCE: "I think we're headed to a [government] shutdown." pic.twitter.com/Gz41x7JKl6
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) September 29, 2025
In the past, the party not in power would always want a shutdown because then they'd blame the party in power for all the Government workers who are not getting paid.
And Chuck Schumer thinks he's just going to roll out that same plan here, but he doesn't realize this time is different!
Think about it...
What has President Trump spent most of the past 9 months fighting to do?
He's been up to the Supreme Court many times on the issue of who in Government he can and can't fire.
He's won most or all of those cases, but they're taking a lot of time and a lot of effort.
What would be better?
Just shut the whole damn thing down and start over!
Clean house!
Wipe things clean and later on rebuild only the people and things you need.
And the cherry on top?
Of course Trump couldn't do this on his own, Democrats would be outraged! So the cherry on top is to get Chuck Schumer to do it for him!
And Chuck is playing right into Trump's hand -- but hey, no one ever said this guy was smart:
Mark it down, President Trump and Russ Vought are going to PERMANENTLY eliminate thousands of jobs out of the Government during this process:
If there is a govt “shutdown”, Trump has ordered Russ Vought to permanently eliminate jobs when funding lapses.
In past shutdowns, they just get a vacation and backpay a few days later (furlough). This time employees will be fired, eliminating thousands of govt union jobs. pic.twitter.com/bygL7UKYAg
— Wall Street Mav (@WallStreetMav) September 29, 2025
Stephen Miller confirms here:
JUST IN: The White House is planning for MASS LAYOFFS if the Democrats allow the government to shut down, according to Politico.
Politico: “The Office of Management and Budget move to permanently reduce the government workforce if there is a shutdown.”
“In the memo, OMB told… pic.twitter.com/zbbXQj13Pw
— RedWave Press (@RedWave_Press) September 25, 2025
Look at some of these beautiful numbers...
HHS - 41% of jobs could go!
CDC - could lose 64% of jobs!
NIH - 75% of jobs!
🇺🇸 US GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN TO SLASH HEALTH AGENCIES
41% of Health and Human Services staff, over 32,000 workers, will be furloughed if Congress fails to avoid a shutdown.
CDC will lose 64% of staff, crippling opioid, HIV, and diabetes prevention programs.
NIH faces a 75% cut,… pic.twitter.com/7JLepki0m0
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) September 29, 2025
It's brilliant folks!
And I almost considered not publishing this article so I didn't tip off Chuck Schumer but let's be honest, he has no good options here and as I said he's not smart enough to figure it out anyway!
Here was President Trump earlier today:
Under a new White House plan, potentially tens of thousands of federal employees could be laid off for good if there is no deal to fund the government before the deadline expires. @
edokeefe reports.
https://t.co/mWCenFh96J pic.twitter.com/yLwZd9a3S8
— CBS Evening News (@CBSEveningNews) September 25, 2025
Speaker Thune fully explains:
pic.twitter.com/WMMdg7IXmE
— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 29, 2025
TRANSCRIPT:
But their whole thing is, "It's up to you." That's their message. Uh, what do you say to that?
Well, I- I don't know where they come up with that because we are Republicans united, House Republicans, Senate Republicans, President Trump. The House Republicans have passed a short-term funding resolution that is clean, nonpartisan, and came over to the Senate. It's sitting at the desk in the Senate. We could pick it up and pass it tonight. The president would sign it into law. The government stays open. It's that simple.
And what they're trying to do is create a, uh, counter-narrative that, uh, suggests that they can add trillions of dollars of spending, uh, free healthcare for illegals to this thing, and it's just flat, you know, there, there, there's just, there isn't a, um, a world in which they're being realistic. This is a totally unserious proposal.
You wrote an op-ed and you said, in fact, uh, the Democrats voted 13 times for clean funding bills while President Biden was in office. So what is the explanation, uh, why not this time to continue negotiating the appropriations bills?
Well, we, this is And that's exactly what we wanna do, and I've made this very clear. You pass a short-term funding resolution that will enable us to finish the other appropriations bills through the normal regular process. So we wanna fund the government the way that it should be funded, which is through regular order. And that's the appropriations committee marking up bills, reporting 'em to the floor, opening it up to the amendment process. That's the way it used to work.
Um, in Chuck Schumer- Schumer's universe, we didn't do appropriations bills. It was all written behind closed doors in his office. And now he's upset because he isn't being consulted on everything because we're doing things the way we should be doing 'em, allowing Republican senators and Democrat senators to work together to pass these bills. And what we need is to fund the government, give us some time to, to do the rest of the appropriations bills.
And if there are other issues they wanna talk about, one of which is this premium tax credit issue, we're wel- you know, we welcome that conversation. But you can't hold the federal government hostage. Release the hostage, and then we can start talking about these other things.
You know, Leader Jeffries said, um, in the Oval Office, there was a frank and direct discussion. In Washington, that translates to heated at times. Was it heated?
Well, I mean, I think it was, uh, it was-
Lively?
It was lively. It was spirited. And, um, you know, obviously they're in a tough spot politically. And I, and I get it. I mean, they've got a base that is demanding that they fight anything related to President Trump. This, you know, you mentioned the 13 times they did this. When they, when they had the majority, the Democrats did, you had Joe Biden in the White House, passed 13 short-term continuing resolutions.
Well, what's changed? Donald Trump's the president. That's what's changed. But, you know, on the health issue, health providers could lose 32 billion if ACA credits at the center of the shutdown fight expire. The lapse in Obamacare subsidies could also lead to an additional 7.7 billion in unpaid medical bills for uninsured patients, from uninsured patients. Big deal, right? For a lot of people.
Well, the premium tax credit issue is something we're willing to have a conversation about. But the fact of the matter is, it is rife with waste, fraud, and abuse. It needs reforms. It is a program where the government pays, makes direct payments to insurance companies. Insurance companies get subsidies to cover more people, so through their agents and brokers, they go out and auto enroll people, many of whom don't even know they have coverage.
And of the 23 million people who were covered in the exchanges last year, 12 million never filed a claim 'cause a lot of 'em don't even know they have coverage. And there's no income caps on it. There's a couple in West Virginia making $580,000 a year that's getting subsidies from the federal government for their healthcare.
Um, there are, you know-
But you're willing to work on this issue in particular?
Yeah, I mean, part of this is the, the base Obam- Obamacare program is not gonna be affected. What's gonna be affected is the enhancements that the Democrats added when they had the majorities. So we're-
What about-
But we're willing to have that conversation. But you gotta do that in, you can't do that in the context of a hostage-taking situation, which is where we are right now.
What about the OMB director's letter, uh, Russ Vought, in which he asks the department heads or tells them there might be possible permanent layoffs, uh, saying, "Agencies are directed to use this opportunity to consider reduction in force notice for all employees that don't fit under, uh, being funded by the funding that continues."
Right. Well, and that's, and that's exactly why we oughta keep the government open.
So that's a real threat?
Well, I mean, I think that Look, if you, you have to manage a shutdown. If you're Russ Vought, you have to figure out in the middle of a shutdown, "What am I gonna do? How am I gonna shift money around?" It is the American people that get hurt by this. There is no reason for a government shutdown. Republicans are united, House Republicans, Senate Republicans, the president of United States, all agree to keep the government open.
All it takes is Chuck Schumer to agree to put the bill that's sitting at the Senate desk. The House has passed it. We can pass it. President signs it into law. Government stays open.
You know, we saw this train coming down the tracks. I interviewed you in July and asked specifically about this. Take a listen. You're gonna need Schumer's support to keep the government open. We are.
And we, and we- And so how are you gonna get it?
Well, I mean, we, it, at some point, you hope that in the interest of the country, that they will work with us on issues like funding the government. But it's been very hard because at least right now, they're, anything that the president wants, they're against. Said anything the president wants, they're against. And we're at this moment.
Are you in the same place?
Well, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about because it is. This is a clean, short-term, bipartisan funding resolution, something we did 13 times when the Democrats had the majority. And all we have to do is pick it up and pass it and then we can go to work on the other appropriations bills and the other things that Democrats want to address.
But they've tried to introduce, you know, a trillion dollars in new spending, free healthcare for illegals, uh, as part of their proposal. And we can't do that by tomorrow night at midnight. And we're not gonna do most of that stuff anyway. But if they wanna do something on premium tax credits, uh, we're open to having that conversation.
Su- But you can't do it in this context. Schumer is running scared from his political left. I mean, it's that simple. And again, this is all about who's in the White House. They did this 13 times when Biden was in the White House.
So chances right now, standing in the White House driveway, that the government shuts down, where do you put it?
Well, I mean, it's up to them and, uh, I don't know-
So above 50%.
Well, if the Democrats are coming out and saying flatly, um, "We will vote," repeatedly, and they will have to because we won't force 'em to vote 'cause the bill is sitting in the Senate to, to keep the government or to shut the government down, not to fund the government. It's up to them. The ball is in their court and, um, this is-.
------------------
From WLT Report
Link:
https://wltreport.com/2025/09/30/bre...esigned-today/
.
English
Deutsch
Français
Español
Italiano
Português
Norsk
Nederlands
Dansk
Suomi
Polski
Čeština
Русский
日本語
한국어
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Magyar
Türkçe
العربية
ไทย
Latina
हिन्दी
Bahasa Indonesia
Bahasa Melayu
